| |
Over the past several years,
almost every major airport conference has included an agenda item that
was either directly or indirectly related to airport privatization. In
1992, AAAE produced its own study on this topic that was subsequently
updated in January, 1997. Likewise, in 1996, the U.S. General Accounting
Office published an examination of airport privatization that provided
background for the Federal Airport Privatization Program that was
implemented this fall.
The worldwide demand for
airport infrastructure funding is driving airport privatization efforts
in almost every country except the U.S. Companies engaged in the
business of airport management/ownership are increasing and many
governments are in the process of evaluating privatization options.
However, in the U.S., because of revenue diversion limitations and other
issues, there are only a handful of U.S. airport privatization examples
(Indianapolis, Burbank, Atlantic City, Albany and a few others).
This is not to say that
interest in privatization of U.S. airports is not increasing. In
September, 1997, the Los Angeles-based Reason Foundation published a
policy brief titled "Airport Privatization Pilot Program (copy
available through Janelle Olson, NWAAAE Executive Secretary). This
brief, designed to stimulate privatization interest and dialogue, was
mailed to mayors, city councils and transportation officials overseeing
the 100 largest U.S. airports. Additionally, private management firms
and consulting services are actively marketing privatization to
communities and airport operators.
So, why is this important to
us? Currently, the popular literature on governance and public services
relates primarily to the elimination of bureaucracy and gains in
government efficiency. Local officials are exposed to countless articles
with anecdotal privatization examples. In many cases, local governments
are short on financial resources and officials are looking for ways to
(guess what) do more with less. In this environment, many airport
managers may be faced with fielding questions about airport
privatization and/or defending current management practices. Here in
Eugene, city officials are beginning to consider and evaluate various
methods, including private options, of providing public services.
During the past several
months, I have had several discussions with Chapter members on this
topic. There appears to be an interest on the part of some members to
learn more about airport privatization. For example, what are the
fundamental benefits and limitations of privatization of airport
infrastructure? Is it likely that U.S. airports can be successfully
privatized? These are professionally relevant questions for some of our
Chapter members. If there is enough interest within the Chapter, we will
explore providing a Chapter-sponsored opportunity for learning more on
this topic from leaders in the field of airport privatization. If this
idea interest you, please drop Janelle or myself a note prior to the
March 13, 1998 NWAAAE Chapter Board Meeting.
Back
to Top
Back to Presidents' Reports
|